首页> 外文OA文献 >Ecology : its relative importance and absolute irrelevance for a Christian : a Kierkegaardian transversal space for the controversy on eco-theology
【2h】

Ecology : its relative importance and absolute irrelevance for a Christian : a Kierkegaardian transversal space for the controversy on eco-theology

机译:生态学:它对基督徒的相对重要性和绝对无关性:一个克尔凯郭尔的横向空间,用于生态神学的争论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The controversy about the importance of eco-theology or creation spirituality seems to bein a deadlock. Those who support it and those who oppose it do not even seem to be ableto communicate with one another. On the one hand, Celia Deane-Drummond, for example,writes in her Eco-theology (2008:x): ‘I find it astonishing that courses on eco-theology do notexist in many university departments of theology and religious studies.’ Matthew Fox desperatelyasks in his Creation spirituality (1991:xii): ‘Need I list the [environmental] issues of our daythat go virtually unattended to in our culture?’ On the other hand, evangelical Christians areknown for their ecological ‘blind spot’ (Davis 2000), until recently at least. Pentecostal proponentsof the prosperity gospel preach a consumer-lifestyle for all Christians, which is not veryeco-friendly (cf. Kroesbergen 2013). Even in more mainline Christianity we find, for example,the well-known theologian Robert Jenson who writes in his Systematic theology: Volume 2(1999:113, n. 2): ‘Recent waves of “creation spirituality” are simply apostasy to paganism. Andit is such unguarded, even unargued judgement that is required of the church.’ We find ecotheologians,who do not understand that not everyone agrees with them on the one hand, andopposing theologians, who do not even feel the need to argue against them on the other hand.What would be needed to re-open communication between those in favour of eco-theology orcreation spirituality, and those opposed to it?
机译:有关生态神学或创造灵性的重要性的争论似乎陷入僵局。那些支持它和反对它的人似乎甚至无法彼此交流。一方面,例如西莉亚·迪恩·德拉蒙德(Celia Deane-Drummond)在她的《生态神学》(Eco-theology)(2008:x)中写道:“令人惊讶的是,许多大学的神学和宗教研究领域都没有生态神学课程。”福克斯(Fox)绝望地问他的创作灵性(1991:xii):“我需要列出当今我们在文化中几乎无人注意的[环境]问题吗?”另一方面,福音派基督徒以其生态“盲点”而闻名(戴维斯(Davis) 2000年),直到最近。繁荣福音的五旬节派拥护者向所有基督徒宣扬一种消费生活方式,这种生活方式并不十分友好(参见Kroesbergen 2013)。甚至在更主流的基督教中,我们也发现例如著名的神学家罗伯特·詹森(Robert Jenson)在他的《系统神学》(Systematic theology)中:第2卷(1999:113,n.2):“最近的“创造灵性”浪潮简直是异教徒的叛教。我们发现了生态神学家,他们不了解并不是每个人一方面都同意他们的观点,而反对神学家,他们甚至不认为有必要与他们争论另一方面,在主张生态神学创新的灵性者与反对生态神论的灵性者之间重新开放交流将需要什么?

著录项

  • 作者

    Kroesbergen, Hermen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号